Of course Alcoa agreed to stay for another 3.5 years. Who wouldn't if New York State gave you money to pay your employees for two or more years? At the very least they should have renegotiated the …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Of course Alcoa agreed to stay for another 3.5 years. Who wouldn't if New York State gave you money to pay your employees for two or more years? At the very least they should have renegotiated the employees contract to lessen the burden on state taxpayers. I don't think the taxpayers should be in the business of subsidizing company payrolls.