Hey F.A.R.M., that’s the best you have? That picture showing an “abandoned house” in Nova Scotia in 2006? No weeds or growth around the house…looks mowed to me. The house tightly surrounded …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Hey F.A.R.M., that’s the best you have? That picture showing an “abandoned house” in Nova Scotia in 2006? No weeds or growth around the house…looks mowed to me. The house tightly surrounded by turbines reminds me of the photoshopped picture on the website of the CCRP that showed a bunch of turbines on APA land. There are no turbines to be located in Hopkinton that are on APA land. They couldn’t even get the location right. So F.A.R.M., what you have is the wrong country, the wrong year, and the wrong wind company. Three strikes, you’re out!