With all the fluoride readily available to those who want it, the absurdity of a decision to continue to make everyone have it in their tap water, against the will of many, may raise the question of …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
With all the fluoride readily available to those who want it, the absurdity of a decision to continue to make everyone have it in their tap water, against the will of many, may raise the question of whether fluoride’s neurotoxicity has in fact affected people’s cognitive abilities. “Safe and effective” was coined more than 70 years ago, and the ADA has been practicing a full spectrum of apologetics ever since, while recruiting endorsements with its propaganda along the way. And collusively, “The solution to pollution is dilution” reigns on, in this case diluting the corrosive, toxic emissions from phosphate fertilizer processing into the public drinking water. Fluoridation’s well-documented and sordid history reveals all of this.