This past week North Country residents received a glossy six-paneled mailing from Congresswoman Stefanik that was a thinly veiled campaign mailing disguised as a constituent report. Previous mailings …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
This past week North Country residents received a glossy six-paneled mailing from Congresswoman Stefanik that was a thinly veiled campaign mailing disguised as a constituent report. Previous mailings I have received have never been so flashy. The problem is it came at taxpayers' expense as noted below the return address. Can't Stefanik pay for such a flashy mailing with some of her $1.9 million in contributions, all but $89,149 of which came from corporate PACs and wealthy individuals from outside our district?